What is intellectual developmental disorder?

Intellectual development problem, a neuro-developmental condition, causes difficulties with intellectual tasks. For children with intellectual development issues, learning, speaking, rational thought, making decisions, and planning are all difficult. They frequently struggle in school and may also have problems with classmates and ordinary everyday routines such as showering or dressing. Although children may appear to be misbehaving, the underlying issue is that they do not understand what constitutes acceptable behavior.

Intellectual development disorder is a relatively new diagnosis. Previously, the same symptoms were referred to as “mental retardation.”

What are the symptoms of intellectual development disorder?

• Slow learning is a crucial indicator of a problem with intellectual growth. Among the specific signs are:
• Being slower than other children in walking, crawling, or talking
• Having trouble keeping up in class
• Having memory, problem-solving, or learning and applying new information issues.
• Having difficulty reading people’s body language, recognizing social cues, and communicating with them
• Having difficulties making and retaining friendships
• Having problems with basic self-care or money management daily
• Difficulty managing or coordinating duties

How is intellectual development disorder diagnosed?

A child might be diagnosed with an intellectual developmental disability if he has an IQ score of less than 70. The IQ test is used to assess a person’s ability to think and learn.

Furthermore, children with intellectual development impairments have at least two of the following challenges:

• Providing and receiving information (communication skills).
• conversing and collaborating with others (interpersonal skills).
• Routine skills such as dressing and using the restroom.
• Intellectual development disorders frequently begin before birth. It can also be caused by injuries or being exposed to dangerous drugs before the age of 18.

Which factors increase the chance of intellectual development disorder?

Risk factors for intellectual development disorder include:

• Genetic factors
• The baby’s brain did not develop normally while he was still in the womb.
• The mother used drugs or drank alcohol while pregnant.
• Issues with the child’s birth
• Bad brain injury
• Certain illnesses
• Seizures
• Nobody looked after the child when she was a baby.

How is intellectual development disorder treated?

There is no cure for the problem of intellectual development. Special education and rehabilitation programs can help children gain some of the abilities they will need as adults. The essential goals are their enjoyment and their ability to behave autonomously when possible.

Early epidemiological findings on intellectual disability/intellectual developmental disorder

The Isle of Wight studies used the Wechsler intelligence scale for children to calculate IQ scores for all 10 to 12-year-old children, noting that 2.5% of the children scored two standard deviations or more below the mean and that multiple disabilities and disorders were more prevalent, particularly among children with the severe intellectual developmental disorder. Cerebral palsy and epilepsy were the most often reported disability.

The Isle of Wight study discovered an inverse relationship between children’s IQ levels and the incidence of behavioral disorders based on teacher ratings.

Other epidemiological studies revealed the negative relationship between IQ and problem behavioral disorders. A large-scale study including 175 000 people in the Camber well neighborhood of South East London identified diverse patterns of mental diseases across the IQ severity range, using two-stage total population evaluations comparable to those performed on the Isle of Wight.

Early studies investigated the effects of a subject’s age, gender, family history, the presence of biological factors, social and environmental influences, and differences between urban and rural settings. Rather than looking at co-occurring mental disorders, the primary focus was on categorizing Intellectual Developmental Disorders based on intellectual levels.

However, early research consistently demonstrated that males had greater rates of moderate Intellectual Developmental Disorder and somewhat higher rates of severe/profound Intellectual Developmental Disorder (excess particularly marked a similar sex pattern among children with higher functioning ASD at IQ values of 70 and above).

In terms of family history, children with mild Intellectual Developmental Disorder had a higher incidence of the disorder than those with the severe or profound intellectual developmental disorder. Remote locations were shown to have greater rates of Intellectual Developmental Disorder than metropolitan areas, albeit the disparities were less obvious once national standard services were implemented, providing improved transportation and communication to rural communities.

Early studies also discovered that co-occurring mental diseases showed a distinct pattern of increased co-occurrence with ASD, childhood psychosis, hyperkinetic disorder (ADHD), and stereotyped disorders among study participants with mild Intellectual Developmental Disorder and IQs of 50 or lower.

The rates more than doubled when epilepsy and brain damage was present. Family and socioeconomic adversity factors, as well as the requirement for a separate examination of language from intellectual and adaptive deficits, were important confounders that needed to be adjusted for.

Exclusion of intellectual disability/Intellectual Developmental Disorder in epidemiological studies in child and adolescent psychiatry

Despite the early success of Intellectual Developmental Disorder epidemiology research and the resurgence of interest in psychiatric epidemiology in the post-DSM-III period, it is surprising that these two lines of inquiry did not overlap. This could be a result of the antagonism that existed at the time between mental health and Intellectual Developmental Disorder services.

As a result, it is not surprising that intellectual developmental disorder, ASD, and pervasive developmental disorders that are not otherwise specified were excluded from studies due to difficulties with ascertainment, difficulties with assessment via self-report or semi- or structured interviews, and ethical safeguards for vulnerable research study participants.

Axis II developmental diseases were not the only ones excluded; anorexia nervosa, posttraumatic stress disorder, and specific learning challenges were also excluded. Preschoolers were commonly overlooked.

Children and adolescents with Intellectual Developmental Disorders were omitted from both the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview World Mental Health Surveys and the National Comorbidity Surveys in the United States. Several longitudinal epidemiological studies of the prevalence, risk factors, and continuity/discontinuity of child and adolescent mental disorders have been done, similar to the exclusion of research participants with intellectual developmental disorders.

The Primary Care Study of US Children, the Dunedin Study, the Dutch Epidemiological Studies, the New York Longitudinal Study, the Ontario Child Mental Health Study, and the New York Study were among them.

Health burden worldwide, including that caused by intellectual disability and developmental brain disorders

Between 1990 and 2013, global life expectancy at birth increased by 6.2 years, while healthy life expectancy increased by 5.4 years. The global burden of disease (GBD) now ranks among the top 20 causes and top 20 most expensive diseases in terms of the contribution of intellectual developmental disorder.

Indeed, as a result of global gains in infant mortality and childhood survival, the GBD metric is now more relevant to the complete collection of neurodevelopmental disorders, even in the setting of Sub-Saharan Africa. In the context of specific environmental exposures such as lead, global estimations of the GBD attributable to the contribution of Intellectual Developmental Disorder(due to IQ point losses) have been made.

Current status of comorbidity of mental ill-health and intellectual disability/Intellectual Developmental Disorder among youth

Population-based estimates of co-occurring mental disorders in kids and teens with Intellectual Developmental Disorders range from 10 to 60% due to methodological limitations such as biased sampling, updated diagnostic criteria, different IQ cutoffs, and methods used to detect psychopathology. A thorough methodological analysis

Non-representative samples, sample sizes under 100, single mental disorders, unreliable diagnoses, diagnoses made by a single rater or without an explanation of the technique used, and response rates less than two-thirds are all rejected. Only nine investigations remained from an initial pool of 85. Only four of the nine studies employed a comparison group. In comparison to the reference group, which had co-occurring mental disorders at a rate ranging from 8 to 18%, Intellectual Developmental Disorders ranged from 30 to 50%. The relative probability of mental disorder co-occurrence with Intellectual Developmental Disorder ranges from 2.8 to 4.5.

The reported prevalence estimates for co-occurring mental disorders in the five remaining studies without a comparison group varied from 30 to 41%, which is comparable to rates in studies with a comparison group.

The impact of three risk factors—the child’s age, gender, and the severity of intellectual developmental disorder—on the co-occurrence of mental disorders was examined. Socioeconomic status was a fourth component that might be discovered through two studies. Positive results have been reported: By age, younger children (aged 5-10) had a higher likelihood of hyperactivity, older children with Intellectual Developmental Disorder (aged 11–16) had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with an emotional illness, and younger children (aged 5-13) had a higher degree of co-occurring mental disorders.

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder was more common in older children (aged 13 to 20 years); by sex: higher prevalence of co-occurring mental disorders among men only; men were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a conduct disorder/hyperactivity; significantly higher overall prevalence rates of co-occurring mental disorders among men reported, and by socioeconomic status: one study discovered a significant association between socioeconomic status and mental disorder with significant significance.

The Australian Child to Adult Development study looked at children and adolescents aged 5 to 19 who had severe and profound intellectual developmental disorders. Both groups showed high follow-up mortality rates, and the adolescents with profound Intellectual Developmental Disorders had considerable physical issues. The profound Intellectual Developmental Disorder group performed significantly worse on all DBC subscales, except the social-related subscale.

The END